OpenAI's rush on the Navier-Stokes claim wasn't to scoop researchers, argues observer
_AashishReddy · x · 2026-09-11
In the ongoing debate, AashishReddy argues OpenAI's rush to publish wasn't to scoop researchers but to achieve parity when Anthropic announced; internally, Bubeck reportedly tried to ensure Alpöge/Buckmaster got credit, though authorship negotiations were mishandled due to misinformation. littmath notes he wasn't referring only to OpenAI.
More from Fun
- Nathan Lambert responds to curiosity about his background with a selfie: 'Not in SF' — natolambert · 2026-10-27
- SMBC comic: chicken nuggets as 'a tacit covenant restated every time I supply you' — rickasaurus · 2026-10-27
- Viral shitpost: hackers pwned my iPhone, my router runs on zero-point energy — ctjlewis · 2026-10-27
- Inference is just Kubernetes with a multi-trillion-dollar market, and the communities overlap — matt_slotnick · 2026-10-27
- yetone posts an AI-written 'autopsy report and apology' for the magpie gateway outage — lxfater · 2026-10-27
- "XiaoBi's NBA Dream": a bunny's basketball career lasts exactly 3 seconds — ComprehensiveWin7619 · 2026-10-27