OpenAI's rush on the Navier-Stokes claim wasn't to scoop researchers, argues observer
_AashishReddy · x · 2026-09-11
In the ongoing debate, AashishReddy argues OpenAI's rush to publish wasn't to scoop researchers but to achieve parity when Anthropic announced; internally, Bubeck reportedly tried to ensure Alpöge/Buckmaster got credit, though authorship negotiations were mishandled due to misinformation. littmath notes he wasn't referring only to OpenAI.
More from Fun
- "My daughter just smiled at me. I don't care if it's real" goes viral — justalexoki · 2026-09-11
- ESP32 Digital Pets Go on Playdates: Cheap Hardware Meets AI Companions — floguo · 2026-09-11
- Feeding Astra's Computer-Use Logs to Fable 5.1 for a Laugh — Sauers_ · 2026-09-11
- Using Muse to Build Muse: Alexandr Wang Shares a Self-Referential Dev Workflow — alexandr_wang · 2026-09-11
- Agent with a credit card designs, sources parts and orders a mini DJ controller — bigblueboo · 2026-09-11
- 'A ChatGPT subscription won't turn a hobbyist into a scientist' — the results-vs-understanding debate continues — gerardsans · 2026-09-11