We Measure AI by What It Replaces — Engelbart's Augmentation Lens Matters More
Admirable_Wasabi_732 · reddit · 2026-09-11
The author argues AI progress is framed almost exclusively around replacement, ignoring the other question: what can humans now do that they couldn't before?
- Invokes Douglas Engelbart's 1962 "Augmenting Human Intellect": the unit of improvement is human + tools + methods + training, not the machine alone.
- Uses chess as the case study: Deep Blue beating Kasparov anchored the replacement narrative, but Advanced Chess reframed it as human vs human+machine.
- AI is singular in that one technology can amplify reasoning, memory, learning, perception, creativity, communication and action at once.
- Current benchmarks measure machine capability; the author calls for an equally serious way to measure human capability gained via AI access, and asks for real examples.
Related event: Rethinking AI Metrics: Measure Human Augmentation, Not Just Replacement(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- People Neglect Human Agency Both Ways: Exaggerated Doom and Complacent Optimism — jankulveit · 2026-09-11
- Garrison Lovely's 'Obsolete' on AI Replacing Labor Lands September 2026 with Heavyweight Blurbs — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-11
- AI Doom Skeptics Hit Back: EA-Driven Apocalypse Talk Doesn't Reflect Most Top-Tier Researchers — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-11
- Over 1,000 AI Policy Initiatives Launched in 70+ Countries, but the Governance Gap Widens — CurieuxExplorer · 2026-09-11
- Swedish tech veteran: Dyson spheres now feel 'inevitable' — 90% excited, 10% terrified — erikstarck · 2026-09-11
- Creativity is the reward for a well-stocked knowledge base, not the opposite of memorization — mmmbchang · 2026-09-11