X debate: that '10% probability' AI claim has no data behind it
AIandDesign · x · 2026-09-11
AIandDesign pushes back on a widely cited "10% probability" estimate, arguing the debate isn't about semantics: the number simply isn't rooted in any data — "a guy just threw that number out there." Replies question how such a probability could be derived at all.
More from AGI Musings
- Caught between two extremes: 'we're all dying' doomers vs 'AI risk is a psyop' deniers — gabriel1 · 2026-09-11
- Gary Marcus dissects the 'AI kills everyone by 2030' claim: no extinction, but real damage to address — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-11
- Gary Marcus mocks AGI arguments that rely on 'AI will think of things we can't imagine' — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-11
- 30-year technologist slams AI doom activists: record safety is historic — robleclerc · 2026-09-11
- Markets underprice AGI and overprice stagnation, argues Ronald Qiao — abhiadesai · 2026-09-11
- MILA's Irina Rish: AGI is practically here, ahead of my 7-year CERC schedule — irinarish · 2026-09-11