Kimmonismus slams Jacob Coxon: AI safety arguments rest on 'could,' not evidence
kimmonismus · x · 2026-09-10
kimmonismus says every Jacob Coxon clip annoys him more, arguing his case boils down to speculation — 'RSI could happen, AI could wipe out humanity' — with no evidence. Others counter that Coxon could have stayed to help build a safe AI future.
Related event: kimmonismus Slams Coxon: AI Safety Arguments Rest Only on 'Could'(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI Builders Aiming at the Wrong Economy, While Real Businesses Go Untouched — andrew_n_carr · 2026-09-10
- AI won't kill us, but OpenAI and Anthropic want total control, says Ondrej — IgorCarron · 2026-09-10
- Two-year law school experiment: ChatGPT training advantage mostly vanished by year two — HarrySurden · 2026-09-10
- Critic mocks an AI lab's 'mass psychosis': double-digit extinction odds, no concrete scenario — almmaasoglu · 2026-09-10
- Chris Olah revisits Anthropic's 'Core Views on AI Safety' and safety difficulty distribution — AaronBergman18 · 2026-09-10
- Gary Marcus endorses claim that AI's real threat is eroding human understanding, not doom — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-10