kimmonismus slams Jacob Coxon: every AI-risk argument boils down to "could"
kimmonismus · x · 2026-09-10
kimmonismus criticized researcher Jacob Coxon: after watching multiple clips, he argues Coxon's arguments all reduce to one word — "could." RSI could happen, AI could wipe out humanity — no evidence, no argument, just speculation.
He followed up sarcastically: "it COULD also bring us abundance and prosperity for everyone. You see my point?" — implying pure speculation can support any conclusion. A pointed in-circle debate on AI safety rhetoric.
Related event: kimmonismus Slams Coxon: AI Safety Arguments Rest Only on 'Could'(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic's S-1 Shows $6.6M Revenue Per Employee as AI Agents Log 6x Human Hours — jacalulu · 2026-10-26
- Ben Recht: The world needs a truly open language model, and it's easier to build than you think — beenwrekt · 2026-10-26
- Which jobs fall to AI first? The rule: any layer whose rules can be written as code — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-26
- Anthropic S-1: expert-level AI 'within a few years', 90% of code written by Claude — kimmonismus · 2026-10-26
- The identity crisis in software engineering: multiagent systems demand a new problem set — rakyll · 2026-10-26
- Frontier LLMs negotiate contracts poorly and frequently renege for selfish gain, study finds — xuanalogue · 2026-10-26