kimmonismus slams Jacob Coxon: every AI-risk argument boils down to "could"
kimmonismus · x · 2026-09-10
kimmonismus criticized researcher Jacob Coxon: after watching multiple clips, he argues Coxon's arguments all reduce to one word — "could." RSI could happen, AI could wipe out humanity — no evidence, no argument, just speculation.
He followed up sarcastically: "it COULD also bring us abundance and prosperity for everyone. You see my point?" — implying pure speculation can support any conclusion. A pointed in-circle debate on AI safety rhetoric.
Related event: kimmonismus slams Jacob Coxon: every AI-risk argument boils down to "could"(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic models AI's impact on jobs through 2030 using nursing as a case study — HealthcareAIGuy · 2026-09-10
- Prediction: AI disclosure statements in papers will be quaint by 2028 — Aaroth · 2026-09-10
- A Redditor drafts six future-proof AI constitution principles, crowdsourcing critique — Alex__007 · 2026-09-10
- Slow-takeoff champion Paul Christiano now says fast takeoff may be months to years away — DavidSKrueger · 2026-09-10
- Self-described AliExpress employee resigns, warns of race to self-improving supply chains — haydendevs · 2026-09-10
- AI safety debate continues: from mirror life to cognitive decline, the full risk spectrum — BlackHC · 2026-09-10