kimmonismus slams Jacob Coxon: every AI-risk argument boils down to "could"
kimmonismus · x · 2026-09-10
kimmonismus criticized researcher Jacob Coxon: after watching multiple clips, he argues Coxon's arguments all reduce to one word — "could." RSI could happen, AI could wipe out humanity — no evidence, no argument, just speculation.
He followed up sarcastically: "it COULD also bring us abundance and prosperity for everyone. You see my point?" — implying pure speculation can support any conclusion. A pointed in-circle debate on AI safety rhetoric.
Related event: kimmonismus Slams Coxon: AI Safety Arguments Rest Only on 'Could'(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- US chases AGI dominance while China, EU and ASEAN treat AI as public infrastructure — BubblyExtent1693 · 2026-10-27
- Lab monkeys at $30-80K each: a 4-year breeding cycle is the real preclinical drug bottleneck — zebird0 · 2026-10-27
- CJR: journalists should stop hyping AI's supposed humanity — just say 'rogue' — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-27
- PhD applicant emails up 4x YoY due to AI — writing without AI now makes you stand out — AI4Code · 2026-10-27
- Weil's collapse shows BigLaw dies from eroding belief, not a broken business model — jkubicki · 2026-10-27
- All 8 Transformer paper authors left Google, and rival labs captured most of the frontier value — signulll · 2026-10-27