Study finds arXiv's position-paper ban lacks evidence as LLM content rises
yanaiela · x · 2026-09-10
A study by Yanai Elazar and Maria Antoniak, accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026, examines arXiv's decision to ban position papers over concerns about LLM-generated content, and argues the policy lacked quantitative evidence. The paper measures LLM-generated content in review vs. non-review papers using two detection methods.
Related event: Study finds arXiv's LLM paper restrictions lack empirical basis(4 posts)→
More from Research
- Paper: data schedules and learning rate schedules should be designed together — alifcoder · 2026-10-27
- Open Models Match GPT-6 on MedMCQA but Trail 17 Points on Hard Clinical Cases — keunwoochoi · 2026-10-27
- Data Curriculum and LR Schedule Should Be Co-Designed: Math Data Placement Flips With Learning Rate — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-10-27
- Health-Focused Benchmark Reranks LLMs: Muse Spark Open Jumps from #9 to #1 — keunwoochoi · 2026-10-27
- Open-source Latch compiles PyTorch into training megakernels, 2.75x faster on H100 — sguada · 2026-10-27
- Goodfire commits $10M to a 'Human Genome Project for AI' to reverse-engineer frontier models — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-10-27