Study finds arXiv's position-paper ban lacks evidence as LLM content rises
yanaiela · x · 2026-09-10
A study by Yanai Elazar and Maria Antoniak, accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026, examines arXiv's decision to ban position papers over concerns about LLM-generated content, and argues the policy lacked quantitative evidence. The paper measures LLM-generated content in review vs. non-review papers using two detection methods.
Related event: Study finds arXiv's LLM paper restrictions lack empirical basis(4 posts)→
More from Research
- KL-Shampoo beats Shampoo and SOAP without Adam, new paper reframes optimizers via KL divergence — _arohan_ · 2026-09-11
- Dankrad: Proving P=NP Would Likely Have Zero Implications for Cryptography — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-11
- NVIDIA Opens BioNeMo Inference Runtime Beta; SandboxAQ Pilots Traceable Drug Discovery on Top — AllThingsApx · 2026-09-11
- If P=NP, proving it would be exactly what AI is good at: unleash agents to find polynomial solutions — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-11
- NASA unveils a 'lunar AI model' trained on 17 years of Moon data for crater mapping and ice detection — Polymarket · 2026-09-11
- ICLR Opens Google's Paper Assistant to Submitters; SAI Offers Free Pre-Submission Reviews Too — ChenhaoTan · 2026-09-11