Anthropic says 'double-check your work' prompts are now an anti-pattern — one dev found 125 in his config
Frequent-Ad-836 · reddit · 2026-09-10
Anthropic published a post on reducing cost and improving performance, with a striking core message: the nudging instructions we added for older models now hurt more than help.
Key points
- Old models only did what you told them, so phrases like "double-check your work" and "be maximally thorough" were necessary. Current models already go the extra mile, so these prompts make them work twice — costing more and yielding worse answers.
- Concrete examples from the post: "be maximally thorough" triggered dozens of unnecessary knowledge-base searches; "double-check your work" caused rework of finished output; contradictory rules (allowed in one place, forbidden in another) meant four valid refunds never went out.
Important nuance
- This isn't an argument for stripping everything. Remove the nudges, keep hard constraints (e.g., "never click publish twice"), and use the dedicated effort parameter instead: too low answers prematurely, too high overthinks easy tasks.
The author audited his own rule files afterward: 66 instances of "must" and 54 of "never" — 125 total — and suspects most are deletable nudges rather than real stops.
More from coding & agent
- Stanford's PaperFormalizer turns research papers into Lean-verified versions with author in the loop — StanfordUniversity · 2026-10-27
- Hugging Face TRL makes score centering + masked importance sampling default in async GRPO — _lewtun · 2026-10-27
- AutoResearch agent's weird training curve gets dug into instead of discarded — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-10-27
- Firecrawl offers 2.5x credits to a16z Speedrun founders, unveils $75M Series B — devdigest · 2026-10-27
- Chums: open-source Apple Watch app puts Claude Code and Codex on your wrist — brandon_galang · 2026-10-27
- Open-source Clairic Studio turns pasted text into typed data and working code in 5 languages — dfinke · 2026-10-27