Dev warns: never submit feedback on Codex or Claude sessions — it's explicit permission for data use
brunofmr · x · 2026-09-10
Developer brunofmr warns that he would never provide feedback on a Codex or Claude session regardless of privacy settings, since feedback amounts to explicit permission for data use. He reads privacy policies adversarially: given that purely AI-generated material isn't copyrightable, terms like "yours", "train", and "pure" can all be interpreted against users — if you don't control the inference, the idea isn't yours.
More from Safety
- Apple Watch's new always-listening audio intelligence features and their privacy design — AnhPhuNguyen1 · 2026-09-10
- OpenAI urges Congress for mandatory capability-based national regulation of frontier labs — ShakeelHashim · 2026-09-10
- tszzl: Aligning near-human AI is a reasonable proxy for studying superintelligence alignment — tszzl · 2026-09-10
- OpenAI endorses California bills on independent AI risk verification and synthetic nucleic acid screening — deanwball · 2026-09-10
- Ex-Anthropic researcher sounds alarm on AI arms race, urges US federal action on transparency — StephenLCasper · 2026-09-10
- MIRI's Technical AI Governance Team publishes reading list for newcomers — sethlazar · 2026-09-10