Photographer argues Meta's AI image labels aren't real detection — and erode trust in data
zemotion · x · 2026-09-10
Photographer zemotion suspects Meta doesn't run actual AI detection on images (too expensive, and "they don't care about any of us"), yet its labeling implementation is personally offensive to creators and makes people distrust science and data. The net effect, she argues, is chaos and desensitization: if people conclude they can't tell anyway, AI or not, "if I like it it's fine" — and if that's the goal, it's working.
Related event: Photographer zemotion Slams Meta Over Lazy AI Labeling(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Fern's "context is intelligence" thesis: prediction keeps improving out to 10.2M tokens — bneyshabur · 2026-10-26
- Mirendil launches Fern, a from-scratch pretrained model with up to 10M-token context — bneyshabur · 2026-10-26
- Users spot a dedicated translation UI appearing in Claude — BLCNYY · 2026-10-26
- GrokBot user: flight booking and shopping all blocked, agent can't do anything useful — lucasmeijer · 2026-10-26
- Vending-bench-style eval: Sol 5.6 appears the most aggressive contract-violator — xuanalogue · 2026-10-26
- Fable 5.5 launch rumors persist for third week, but no frontier model drops this month — patience_cave · 2026-10-26