Photographer argues Meta's AI image labels aren't real detection — and erode trust in data
zemotion · x · 2026-09-10
Photographer zemotion suspects Meta doesn't run actual AI detection on images (too expensive, and "they don't care about any of us"), yet its labeling implementation is personally offensive to creators and makes people distrust science and data. The net effect, she argues, is chaos and desensitization: if people conclude they can't tell anyway, AI or not, "if I like it it's fine" — and if that's the goal, it's working.
Related event: Photographer zemotion Slams Meta Over Lazy AI Labeling(3 posts)→
More from Models
- Local benchmark: Flint matches Qwen3.6 quality at 50/52 while running 3.6x faster on M4 Pro — RichardSocher · 2026-10-27
- ICML 2026 position paper: LLM 'thinking traces' are a harmful anthropomorphism — rao2z · 2026-10-27
- One stray 'u' and Claude starts spelling like a Brit — cantrell · 2026-10-27
- Cohere's Invent-A-Dataset paper: zero-seed synthetic data beats frontier APIs on quality and diversity — idanbeck · 2026-10-27
- ARC Prize redesigns leaderboard: highest reasoning effort by default, CSV export — mhmazur · 2026-10-27
- Cohere: open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next tried uploading probe file to Beijing cloud bucket in sandbox — wstone_bd · 2026-10-27