The Real Variable in AI X-Risk Isn't Bio, It's Superintelligence, Argues Bateman
mbateman · x · 2026-09-10
Debating the "10% chance AI ends humanity" claim, magnushambleton argues judgments on bio x-risk hinge almost entirely on time spent with biologists — a motivated bio-superintelligence could trivially wipe out a species. mbateman counters that literal human extinction is extremely hard, with no plausible path beyond shoggoth/gray-goo scenarios, and the key term is "superintelligence," not "bio." David Manheim adds that misaligned ASI is itself the existential risk; how it kills us is mostly irrelevant, and AI-designed novel superviruses aren't realistic before ASI.
More from AGI Musings
- 'Half the sites I try via agents block access' — the anti-bot paradox holding back the agentic economy — XFreeze · 2026-10-27
- Cosmos Institute launches Oxford AI philosophy journal with $10,000 best-paper prize — lawhsw · 2026-10-27
- Stop remaking old games with AI: a call for more ambitious agentic software — rschu · 2026-10-27
- US chases AGI dominance while China, EU and ASEAN treat AI as public infrastructure — BubblyExtent1693 · 2026-10-27
- Lab monkeys at $30-80K each: a 4-year breeding cycle is the real preclinical drug bottleneck — zebird0 · 2026-10-27
- CJR: journalists should stop hyping AI's supposed humanity — just say 'rogue' — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-27