You can't be both irreplaceable and claim your tech is dangerous
kchonyc · x · 2026-09-09
A sharp PSA: if you're the only one who can build this "super dangerous" technology, you can quit for humanity's sake; if you're not the only one, you're overvalued. You can't claim both — a logical rebuttal to the "I must stay inside to mitigate risk" narrative in AI safety.
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic researchers warn of AI threat to humanity — here's what experts say — ArtificialOther · 2026-09-10
- Ben Moll essay: Why AI won't deliver double-digit GDP growth anytime soon — sebkrier · 2026-09-10
- LeCun amplifies broadside: AI doomers push authoritarian control over imaginary problem — ylecun · 2026-09-10
- Safety debate: those who never joined AI labs gave up even more money — JacquesThibs · 2026-09-10
- EPFL hiring safety pretraining engineers with $1M grant to build 700B open model — manoelribeiro · 2026-09-10
- e/acc founder Beff Jezos mocks doomer Anthropic employee: just delete the weights — beffjezos · 2026-09-09