Economist Alex Imas on what stays scarce after AI: Starbucks' automation U-turn offers a clue
_AustinCalvert_ · x · 2026-09-09
Economist Alex Imas published a long-form essay on the economics of structural change in an AI-abundant world.
- Core question: Any analysis of AI's economic impact must start with what remains scarce. Scarcity won't disappear—it changes form.
- Starbucks case: With a $112B market cap selling highly standardized, easily mechanized products, Starbucks tried cutting labor via automation—then reversed course. CEO Brian Niccol credits handwritten notes, ceramic cups, and better seating for customers who "sit and stay," and the company is hiring more baristas per store.
- Conjecture: Labor reallocates to sectors whose demand structure keeps it a meaningful share of the economy. Citing Girard, Augustine, and Rousseau, he argues that once base needs are met, preferences shift to inherently non-satiated comparative motives—status, exclusivity, social desirability—which machines can't fully substitute.
More from AGI Musings
- Replit CEO on the 'self-driving company': agents to absorb coordination costs by 2030 — amasad · 2026-10-27
- US senator slams AI industry for proposing 50-death threshold for 'catastrophic incident' — peterwildeford · 2026-10-27
- Replit CEO Says AI Makes All Software De Facto Open Source; Aakash Gupta Asks What Moats Remain — aakashgupta · 2026-10-27
- Understanding the AI consciousness debate: which theory of mind is behind it — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- Functionalism: if consciousness is just what the brain computes, silicon can run it too — msharmas · 2026-10-27
- iPhone case with 85,000 reviews in days: everything fake in the age of abundance — tekbog · 2026-10-27