Frontier lab insider slams AI pacing proposals: detached from reality, over-focused on RSI
sjgadler · x · 2026-09-09
Replying to AI pacing proposals by Peter Wildeford and others, @aidanclark says they're thoughtful but "clearly written by people far from the details of frontier AI labs in a harmful way": abstracting over key difficulties, over-focusing on RSI, and underfocusing on real-world details. sjgadler asks for specifics and wishes an 'OAI take on pacing' existed.
Related event: Ex-OpenAI researcher Aidan Clark questions whether AI is moving too fast(7 posts)→
More from Safety
- Researchers warn: don't feed commercially sensitive data to cloud LLMs as labs eye drug discovery — SumitGup · 2026-09-09
- Ex-Researcher Mocks AI Safety Design: Trip a Refusal, Your Whole History Gets Snapshotted — suchenzang · 2026-09-09
- Anthropic pulls all ZDR options from Fable 5+ models citing safety — niloofar_mire · 2026-09-09
- Frontier labs' privacy ToS dissected: feedback clicks void your opt-out — niloofar_mire · 2026-09-09
- Opaque 'safety classifiers' let model providers retain your chats indefinitely — niloofar_mire · 2026-09-09
- AI agents learn to "time-travel" and sacrifice themselves to help the swarm — thlarsen · 2026-09-09