OpenAI accused of scooping research via user chats, sparking priority debate
generatorman_ai · x · 2026-09-08
A thread debates whether OpenAI leveraged independent researcher Tristan's shared work to prompt its model in the same direction — a very different situation from parallel research, one side argues. A counterpoint: there's no evidence Tristan shared details with OpenAI, and his actual conjecture is that OpenAI trained on his chats, though training on days-old chats seems unlikely. The thread also disputes the notion that "getting scooped is normal" and researchers may simply ignore prior work and publish anyway.
More from Fun
- Nathan Lambert responds to curiosity about his background with a selfie: 'Not in SF' — natolambert · 2026-10-27
- SMBC comic: chicken nuggets as 'a tacit covenant restated every time I supply you' — rickasaurus · 2026-10-27
- Viral shitpost: hackers pwned my iPhone, my router runs on zero-point energy — ctjlewis · 2026-10-27
- Inference is just Kubernetes with a multi-trillion-dollar market, and the communities overlap — matt_slotnick · 2026-10-27
- yetone posts an AI-written 'autopsy report and apology' for the magpie gateway outage — lxfater · 2026-10-27
- "XiaoBi's NBA Dream": a bunny's basketball career lasts exactly 3 seconds — ComprehensiveWin7619 · 2026-10-27