AI flagged 20 problems in an approved legal doc; exec panic may trigger a ban
pavanidiotic · reddit · 2026-09-08
An exec ran a minor, already-approved legal doc update through Claude without context. The model flagged 20+ "issues," most of which were standard clauses meant to be there. The exec escalated org-wide, forcing actual reviewers to defend a non-issue — and the proposed fix is banning AI on sensitive work instead of building a proper review process. The poster asks how others handle this: guardrail tools, org AI rules, or reverting to manual review.
More from Companies & People
- Glean Is Worth $7.2B, but What's Actually Its Moat? — yogthinks · 2026-09-11
- Replit CEO joins backlash against AI doomers, says focus should be on cybersecurity not sci-fi — amasad · 2026-09-11
- Replit CEO Amjad Masad: AI existential-risk talk is a distraction from real cybersecurity work — amasad · 2026-09-11
- SF hiring of wet-lab biologists for RL environments draws bio-safety concerns — beffjezos · 2026-09-11
- Schmidhuber appears on the "Europe on Edge" podcast — SchmidhuberAI · 2026-09-11
- VC advice for Indian founders: stop pitching that you'll be in SF, go where customers are — vaibhavbetter · 2026-09-11