Gergely Orosz: "AI trained on person X" is nonsense because people update their views
ducha_aiki · x · 2026-09-07
Responding to a debate about stating opinions with conviction, Gergely Orosz defends "strong opinions, weakly held" and argues the category of "an AI trained on person X" is BS: humans change their minds when new information arrives, but an AI cloned from someone's writing or videos does not.
More from AGI Musings
- Geoffrey Hinton admits he was wrong about AI replacing radiologists — and explains why — Afinetheorem · 2026-09-07
- Open Offices Were Onto Something — But They Need Mature Ambient Compute to Work — curious_vii · 2026-09-07
- Ex-xAI researcher Ethan He: finding the right axis to scale matters more than raw compute — ricklamers · 2026-09-07
- Seth Lazar: Social sciences must self-critique before asking labs for funding — sethlazar · 2026-09-07
- As AI drives creation costs to zero, the 'handmade' premium on creative work erodes — joonasvirtanen · 2026-09-07
- Does simulationism dissolve AGI risk? Researchers clash over Yampolskiy's stance — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-07