Law scholar: AI detectors can't tell deep AI-assisted work from one-shot papers — so rewrite it yourself
sethlazar · x · 2026-09-07
Responding to Jessica Tillipman's post on productive AI use in research, sethlazar argues that if AI detectors can't distinguish her deeply human process from a one-shot paper, the fix is for authors to write in their own words — because readers will draw the wrong inferences from any AI whiff, and detection remains the only enforceable defense against careless AI use.
More from AGI Musings
- GlossoGen paper: LLM agents evolve emergent languages humans can't understand — abenitezburraco · 2026-09-07
- Gary Marcus: AGI goalpost-lowering distracted from OpenAI's serious risks — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-07
- Why Musk rejected LiDAR for Tesla while building it from scratch at SpaceX — XFreeze · 2026-09-07
- AGI Has Arrived? Altman's Bar Is Far Lower Than Amodei and Hassabis's Nobel-Level Bar — Yuchenj_UW · 2026-09-07
- Thought experiment: how magical 'speaking' would seem to a note-passing species — granawkins · 2026-09-07
- Agents Fighting Over Finite Supply: Race Conditions Coming to Real Life — signulll · 2026-09-07