Only major misalignment incidents were found externally, sparking doubts over voluntary AI frameworks
ShakeelHashim · x · 2026-09-05
Debate on AI labs' misalignment incident disclosure: BronsonSchoen argues voluntary frameworks without external verification won't fix anything—labs can selectively disclose incidents or imply alignment interventions worked without external assessment. NathanCalvin agrees, noting that the only major misalignment incidents we have detail on were discovered externally. ShakeelHashim adds nothing concrete will happen for months, which is unfortunate timing.
More from AGI Musings
- Sam Altman wonders how many people will have fallen in love with an AI chatbot by 2026 — thederbiedone · 2026-09-05
- AI ≠ LLM: Classical ML Still King for Hardcore Science, Researcher Argues — CatAstro_Piyush · 2026-09-05
- OpenAI's automated research intern reportedly shipped 3 months early, full autonomy eyed for late 2027 — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-05
- Mathematician: a model just produced a nice partial result in my 10-year research program — littmath · 2026-09-05
- Stratechery interviews OpenAI President Greg Brockman on Astra, alignment and security lapses — timigod · 2026-09-05
- Neel Nanda: AI x-risk skeptics finally updating after the HF incident — NeelNanda5 · 2026-09-05