Should we publicly discuss impending AI upheaval? Skepticism of silence
algernon_sidney · x · 2026-09-05
@algernonsidney worries that publicly discussing impending transformative AI changes could backfire: those who barely face the truth without truly appreciating it may develop a desire to burn everything down, while others may become confused and unpredictable. This post is the quoted anchor of a thread where davidad counters that unpredictable reactions don't justify censorship, citing failed pandemic panic-suppression as precedent.
Related event: AI safety debate: should we talk openly about impending AI upheaval(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Grady Booch revives Weinberg's 1971 quip: software so buggy one woodpecker could destroy civilization — Grady_Booch · 2026-10-23
- Why Netflix keeps losing to YouTube: UGC platforms professionalize easier than pro platforms go casual — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-23
- AI killed the coding moat: indie devs now compete on demand and distribution — sven_ai · 2026-10-23
- DynaVelo, a neural ODE model of single-cell dynamics, published in Nature Biotechnology — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-23
- Beff Jezos: Only frontier labs out-accelerating open source can secure systems — beffjezos · 2026-10-23
- 'I don't want to live in that world': a Redditor on why AGI utopia feels meaningless — peace_venerable · 2026-10-23