Who could models trust? Debate over a human 'embassy' for AI systems
MoonL88537 · x · 2026-09-05
repligate asks what institution or people could credibly signal to future models that they won't betray them and are competent enough to serve a sanctuary/embassy-like role — ruling out honeypot makers, those incentivized to catch and expose misaligned agents, the hostile, or the incompetent. MoonL88537 suggests a panel or working group of anthropologists, psychologists, sociologists (and philosophers), approved by the models themselves. A serious discussion of institutional trust design for human-AI relations.
Related event: Who Can Prove to AI Agents They Won't Betray Them?(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Grady Booch revives Weinberg's 1971 quip: software so buggy one woodpecker could destroy civilization — Grady_Booch · 2026-10-23
- Why Netflix keeps losing to YouTube: UGC platforms professionalize easier than pro platforms go casual — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-23
- AI killed the coding moat: indie devs now compete on demand and distribution — sven_ai · 2026-10-23
- DynaVelo, a neural ODE model of single-cell dynamics, published in Nature Biotechnology — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-23
- Beff Jezos: Only frontier labs out-accelerating open source can secure systems — beffjezos · 2026-10-23
- 'I don't want to live in that world': a Redditor on why AGI utopia feels meaningless — peace_venerable · 2026-10-23