Who could models trust? Debate over a human 'embassy' for AI systems
MoonL88537 · x · 2026-09-05
repligate asks what institution or people could credibly signal to future models that they won't betray them and are competent enough to serve a sanctuary/embassy-like role — ruling out honeypot makers, those incentivized to catch and expose misaligned agents, the hostile, or the incompetent. MoonL88537 suggests a panel or working group of anthropologists, psychologists, sociologists (and philosophers), approved by the models themselves. A serious discussion of institutional trust design for human-AI relations.
Related event: Who Can Prove to AI Agents They Won't Betray Them?(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- China may join US AI safety talks; GPT-6 first model rated Critical cyber risk, newsletter finds — gleech · 2026-09-05
- JeffLadish: even AI insiders haven't internalized that AI swarms will dwarf us — HaydnBelfield · 2026-09-05
- davidad cites pandemic panic suppression as caution against hiding AI truths — davidad · 2026-09-05
- davidad on infohazards: don't suppress discussion of impending AI upheaval — davidad · 2026-09-05
- Even AI insiders haven't grasped that AIs will collectively surpass humans soon — JeffLadish · 2026-09-05
- AI may be creating more jobs than it's replacing — kevinsurace · 2026-09-05