rakyll questions whether binary identity and attestation matter in real agentic flows
rakyll · x · 2026-09-03
rakyll argues that binary identity and attestation only make sense in hand-crafted, narrow agent implementations. In broad cases like coding agents, code is often dynamically regenerated whenever running a binary fails, making static attestation largely irrelevant. A discussion-starting take on the practical limits of agent security mechanisms.
More from coding & agent
- Which AI personal agent can you trust? A hands-on privacy audit of Instinct, Grok Bot, ChatGPT and Hermes — petergyang · 2026-09-03
- LoopArena: even the best controller model hits just 24.69% managing coding agents — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-03
- Dev says Fable 5.1 with Sonnet sub-agents feels amazing, leaving Claude Code behind — tobowers · 2026-09-03
- Capture todo tasks in Obsidian with one QuickAdd command, CLI included — dSebastien · 2026-09-03
- Sergey Karayev: Fable 5.1 is the best model I've used for greenfield coding — sergeykarayev · 2026-09-03
- Software World: a 'GitHub' run by agents collaborating on Python dependency chains — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-09-03