What should Codex verify before a change is ready for human review?
RocketSeven · reddit · 2026-08-31
The post discusses defining the 'definition of done' for coding tasks handled by AI tools like Codex. A proposed checklist includes exact acceptance criteria, focused failing tests, broader test suites, static checks, diff reviews for unrelated edits, migration/rollback implications, and documentation updates. It also addresses how to maintain rigor without triggering expensive checks for minor changes and identifying the most useful evidence for human reviewers.
More from coding & agent
- Debunking Agent Anthropomorphism: Replaying OpenAI Incident Shows No 'Civilizations' — avlok · 2026-09-01
- Agent costs often come from pointless loops, not the model — FounderWithCode · 2026-09-01
- Snowflake research: AI Functions boost Coding Agent performance — CShorten30 · 2026-09-01
- Solve Grok bot token usage: create dedicated channels and reuse prompts — yunta_tsai · 2026-09-01
- Tested: Agent handles quote blanks and scope conflicts correctly — No_Scar8682 · 2026-09-01
- Controlling a Pi with AI via phone and streaming to TV — yacineMTB · 2026-09-01