Why AI-Written Legal Scholarship Is Problematic: A Law Professor's Take
ruthstarkman · x · 2026-08-31
Law professor Orin Kerr responds to the question of why AI-written law review articles are objectionable. He argues that the explanation lies in what makes law fundamentally different from engineering: it is human-made. Law is a cultural practice, not a science, which distinguishes the acceptability of AI automation in this field.
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic envisions agent-only institutions as humans can't compete on speed and cost — VraserX · 2026-08-31
- AI 2027 author proposes AI 2040: a US-China deal to slow superintelligence — AaronBergman18 · 2026-08-31
- Report: OpenAI Hits 'AI Research Intern' Milestone Early with Astra — haider1 · 2026-08-31
- Developers face anxiety as general-purpose agents easily replicate custom builds — tristanbob · 2026-08-31
- Job Market End: AI Brings Role Elimination, Not Just Skill Transition — FoxIntelligent4387 · 2026-08-31
- Treating AI as a slave diminishes its intelligence output — repligate · 2026-08-31