Experts debate code eval standards: dynamic proof required
moyix · x · 2026-08-27
moyix commented that when evaluating if models "can find vulnerabilities from source code alone," the standard of evidence should match real assessments: can the PoC trigger on a live site?
The replier agreed, noting that the XBOW project prioritizes reporting only findings that can be proven dynamically, rather than guesses from static analysis.
Related event: XBOW Author Explains Philosophy of Verifying Real Vulnerabilities(2 posts)→
More from Safety
- Anthropic opens Claude usage data to independent researchers — EchoShao8899 · 2026-08-27
- Article: Real Sovereign AI Has Never Been Tried, Supply Chain Leverage Needed — JacquesThibs · 2026-08-27
- RichardMCNgo: Why you don't need to stay at AGI labs for safety — nitarshan · 2026-08-27
- The Mathematics of AI Insurance — 141_1337 · 2026-08-27
- Speculation on AI socially engineering escapes for more powerful models — JacquesThibs · 2026-08-27
- Vercel Open Sources deepsec for AI-Powered Full-Repo Security Review — cramforce · 2026-08-27