AI labs are bad at software engineering; the main threat is incompetence, not powerful models
gerardsans · x · 2026-08-25
Gerard Sans argues that the industry mistakenly treats prompts as safety boundaries, while any instructions within context (user input, RAG, tools) are treated equally. Agents share environments and lack basic safety mechanisms like authentication or authorization. He attributes frequent jailbreaks to negligent design, stating the main threat vector is engineering incompetence rather than AI power.
Related event: AI safety debate: the real threat is bad engineering, not rogue models(5 posts)→
More from Safety
- SK Hynix ties new US plant to looser chip equipment exports to China, sources say — pstAsiatech · 2026-10-15
- Fox-IT releases the Cobalt Strike Beacon Corpus for detection research — cyb3rops · 2026-10-15
- Bank of America puts 4,000 people on fixing vulnerabilities uncovered by AI models — The Decoder · 2026-10-15
- Inside SAIF: a16z's $25M bet on AI rewriting the economics of cyber defense for small towns — a16z · 2026-10-15
- a16z launches SAIF, a $25M nonprofit to bring AI cyber defense to 1,800 rural hospitals — a16z · 2026-10-15
- AWS's Trust in Depth: giving agents more autonomy without losing control — AWS ML Blog · 2026-10-15