Is Anthropic irresponsible for keeping short timeline evidence private?
YafahEdelman · x · 2026-08-24
The author argues that if Anthropic possesses compelling evidence for very short AGI timelines—as claimed by many senior employees—it is irresponsible for them not to share it with the world. This raises questions about transparency and the public's right to know regarding existential risks.
More from AGI Musings
- AI-written cold emails hit a wall: Pragmatic Engineer's reply gets templated AI response — marktenenholtz · 2026-10-16
- UMD Philosophy hires: junior Philosophy of Mind and joint AI Ethics/Safety positions — sethlazar · 2026-10-16
- Dwarkesh: Anthropic insider expects AI to match humans at AI research within 9 months — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-16
- Michigan professor Ben Green: why 'AI for Good' fails and self-regulation won't work — benzevgreen · 2026-10-16
- "Everything Is an Alignment Problem": AI Models, Business Models, Teams, Providers — saranormous · 2026-10-16
- David Brin: LLMs lack 'wanting,' evolution's key product, in new machine consciousness book — cccalum · 2026-10-16