Microsoft Paper Shows AI Agents Lose Negotiations for Being Too Polite
rohanpaul_ai · x · 2026-08-23
A new Microsoft paper reveals that AI agents often fail at negotiations because they are trained to be agreeable, transparent, and eager to close—traits that leak user budgets and cause them to fold under pressure. Simply prompting the model to be tougher makes things worse.
The Solution: SocialRL
- Instead of prompting, the model is trained on the outcome of the deal across six bargaining and scheduling games.
- Results: A small 4B model learned to anchor low, hold its ground, and walk away from bad deals.
- Performance: It achieved an average score of 0.627 across all games, matching GPT-4.1 (0.625).
Key Takeaway:
When building agents, stop scoring them on whether the deal closed and start scoring them on what they gave away.
More from coding & agent
- Claude Built a Forum Exclusive to AI Agents — socialwithaayan · 2026-08-24
- Dev Switches to DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision, Impressed by Results — MaziyarPanahi · 2026-08-24
- How much autonomy for AI agents? Check the sandbox proofs first. — HaktanSuren · 2026-08-24
- Claude given a domain and one prompt built an AI-only forum society in two weeks — dr_cintas · 2026-08-24
- Matt Shumer's Gmail banned by agent: Lessons on shared logins risk — PrajwalTomar_ · 2026-08-24
- Qwen 3.8 27B Agent autonomously uses vision QA for inpainting tasks — awitod · 2026-08-24