Sol Outperforms Fable in Drawing Code Generation Benchmark
suchenzang · x · 2026-08-23
User compared the performance of Sol and Fable models on generating drawing code (DT code) and counting crossings. Sol performed significantly better in this task. While Fable managed to capture pen stroke details (an "A+ effort"), it tended to get stuck on irrelevant details and failed to accurately count crossings or produce correct code, even when provided with manually improved, clean SVG inputs.
More from Models
- Ox Alpha Revealed to Use Unreleased Zhipu GLM Model — py_blu · 2026-08-23
- User criticizes OpenAI's forced promotion of O1, claims model performance is lackluster — weswinder · 2026-08-23
- Evidence against ox-alpha being GLM: the mystery model accepts video input — qinzytech · 2026-08-23
- GigaCEM CEO: open-source pressure will make frontier models 10x cheaper — bindureddy · 2026-08-23
- Opus 5 Reportedly Rivals Anthropic's Internal Models, Excels at Optimization — scaling01 · 2026-08-23
- GLM-5.3 Outperforms Fable: +11 Points, Half the Cost — zainhas · 2026-08-23