GLM-5.3 Outperforms Fable: +11 Points, Half the Cost
zainhas · x · 2026-08-23
Evaluation results show that a workflow using GLM-5.3 first and escalating to Fable only on verifier failure achieves 81.1% accuracy at $10.74 per task. This represents an 11-point improvement over Fable alone at half the cost. With a high behavior correlation of 0.65 between the models, the author suggests replacing Fable directly with GLM-5.3.
More from Models
- User criticizes OpenAI's forced promotion of O1, claims model performance is lackluster — weswinder · 2026-08-23
- Evidence against ox-alpha being GLM: the mystery model accepts video input — qinzytech · 2026-08-23
- GigaCEM CEO: open-source pressure will make frontier models 10x cheaper — bindureddy · 2026-08-23
- Sol Outperforms Fable in Drawing Code Generation Benchmark — suchenzang · 2026-08-23
- Opus 5 Reportedly Rivals Anthropic's Internal Models, Excels at Optimization — scaling01 · 2026-08-23
- DeepSWE benchmark: GLM-5.3 matches Fable 5 at 1/4th the cost — zainhas · 2026-08-23