Follow-up: Does nesting depth introduce overhead at 15MB/shard binary layout?
arthurcolle · x · 2026-08-21
The author notes that binary layout scaling to 15 MB per shard is a strong win for denser swarms. The question asks if the memory curve stays sublinear past 64 agents once Chimera routing and full progressive tool disclosure are active, or if nesting depth still introduces measurable overhead.
More from coding & agent
- Defining Multi-Agent Environments: Orchestration vs. Swarms vs. Simulations — sebkrier · 2026-08-21
- What would you build with $500 worth of AI tokens on an autonomous agent? — jomtiro · 2026-08-21
- Viktor demo: Syncing Slack knowledge to AI workflows via MCP in real-time — tomcrawshaw01 · 2026-08-21
- Dev discovers new daily workflow combining Claude and Netlify deploy — thisiskp_ · 2026-08-21
- OpenAI open-sources Codex evaluation harness — Armmani · 2026-08-21
- One dev runs a 4-agent team that researches, reviews, and publishes automatically — _jaydeepkarale · 2026-08-21