Physicist: most AI-for-science startups will die, but mining existing literature is the real win
skdh · x · 2026-08-18
Responding to Simon Maechling's thread that AI will mostly accelerate disappointment in science, physicist Sabine Hossenfelder offers a split verdict.
Where she agrees: Most AI-science startups will go bankrupt within a few years, especially those betting on new materials discoveries — she knows someone selling materials-science data to companies, and companies simply won't buy it, doing all testing in-house. Startups catering to academia also have no real money to make.
Where she disagrees: Current AI systems are ideally suited to exploit untapped potential in the existing literature. Thousands of discoveries likely lie in connecting dots across papers that no single human can overview — exactly what AI is good at.
More from AGI Musings
- Dwarkesh Interview: Philosophical Dialogue on AI and Human Intelligence — paulnovosad · 2026-08-18
- Researcher: dodging facts about China's AI leads DC into a parallel reality — pstAsiatech · 2026-08-18
- AI as Thought Partner: The Risk of Letting Models Redefine the Problem — DrKavner · 2026-08-18
- Veteran architect: Gen Z masters AI tools but misses the human layer of architecture — DavidLinthicum · 2026-08-18
- If AI Makes an Employee 3x More Productive, Should You Triple Their KPIs? — Greg_QU · 2026-08-18
- Billions use search agents because search UX has long been broken — StefanoGogioso · 2026-08-18