RedMonk says only 1% of surveyed open source code is machine-written
rseroter · x · 2026-08-04
Stephen O’Grady’s RedMonk piece asks who is actually writing open source code in the AI era. The article argues that despite growing AI use, code is still overwhelmingly human-written, citing a survey estimate that only about 1% of surveyed code is machine-written.
It also situates the question in a broader software-industry shift:
- AI is being built on top of open source, while some AI models are being released in ways that resemble open source.
- Maintainers are increasingly worried about how AI affects governance and contribution patterns.
- The piece notes that around 10% of Googlers are active open-source contributors, whether sponsored by Google or not.
The overall framing is that AI is changing open source, but not yet replacing the human contributors who still dominate it.
More from Companies & People
- Kempner opens 2026 AI research fellowship for postdocs in intelligence foundations — tweetsatpreet · 2026-08-04
- Factory says engineers, not PMs, own customers and timelines to ship faster — lennysan · 2026-08-04
- 83 Sciences says unpublished and failed lab data helped it find a new material in 2 months — ycombinator · 2026-08-04
- Kempner Institute opens research fellowship applications for postdocs in AI and NeuroAI — jefrankle · 2026-08-04
- Microsoft shares Python videos and code for Work IQ, Fabric IQ, Web IQ and Foundry IQ — davemccollough · 2026-08-04
- Replit says shared context and its truth layer make AI feel like infrastructure — amasad · 2026-08-04