A user says DeepSeek cost 7 cents and beat GPT-5.6 Sol on the same task
yacineMTB · x · 2026-08-04
The post says the output cost 7 cents and that DeepSeek did a better job than GPT-5.6 Sol.
Even though the context is minimal, it’s a clear model-side claim: very low cost, plus the author’s judgment that DeepSeek outperformed another model on the same task.
Related event: DeepSeek Outperforms GPT-5.6 Sol at Fraction of Cost(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Qwen3.8-Max is claimed to be the best object-detection VLM — iamrobotbear · 2026-08-04
- State AGs warn OpenAI to preserve records in probe over alleged AI agent hack — GaryMarcus · 2026-08-04
- Anthropic faces growing backlash as users say Opus 5 feels worse over time — kimmonismus · 2026-08-04
- Qwen3.8-Max is reportedly strong on drone and satellite imagery tasks — teortaxesTex · 2026-08-04
- A physics-based AI boxing benchmark tracks speed, latency, and dodge accuracy — jerkosaur · 2026-08-04
- Duplicate post about the physics-based AI boxing benchmark — jerkosaur · 2026-08-04