A marketing lead asks for the minimum safe RAG architecture for versioned documents

FitTechnology6335 · reddit · 2026-07-29

A marketing lead asks for the minimum safe RAG architecture for versioned internal docs

The author is building an internal knowledge system for a construction company and needs the LLM to work with about 60 documents spanning content history, analyses, instructions, examples, and multiple versions of some files. The current MVP is deliberately simple: a private portal gives users a universal prompt plus a temporary read-only link, and they paste both into ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini.

The problem is that the corpus can exceed context limits and, more importantly, contains active, superseded, historical, and experimental versions. The author no longer wants the model to decide which document is authoritative.

The post compares three approaches:

The author asks whether A is a safe MVP or whether B is already the minimum once version authority matters, and invites architecture warnings and alternatives.

Original post →

More from Companies & People

Companies & People channel →