NeurIPS Ethics Reviews Severely Delayed, Sparking Researcher Outrage
abby621 · x · 2026-07-28
An AI researcher expressed strong outrage on X regarding the NeurIPS ethics review process. Their team received two ethics reviews early this morning, weeks after submission and well past the rebuttal period. This severe delay prevented them from adequately addressing the concerns during the official rebuttal phase, highlighting major flaws in the conference's timeline management.
More from Research
- Ono Pharmaceutical partners with Phylo to put agentic AI into drug discovery — KexinHuang5 · 2026-07-29
- AM Forum launches on GitHub as an open space for human-centered AI research — EchoShao8899 · 2026-07-29
- Stanford HAI warns world models need a new governance agenda before safety-critical deployment — StanfordHAI · 2026-07-29
- The Principal-Agent Problem in Research: Researchers Only Care About Their Own Piece of the Puzzle — RexDouglass · 2026-07-28
- How do you evaluate report and deck agents when accuracy misses the real problem — Weekly_Quarter_7875 · 2026-07-28
- Weaviate shows how to retrieve audio directly with Gemini Embedding 2 — eshorten300 · 2026-07-28