Conference chair says one irresponsible reviewer cut a paper down to two reviews
CSProfKGD · x · 2026-07-28
A conference chair says the review process has become so problematic that the event went from three reviews to two because of one reviewer’s irresponsible behavior.
The post frames this as a broader crisis in conference reviewing, a reminder that reviewer reliability and process integrity can materially affect research evaluation.
More from Research
- Ono Pharmaceutical partners with Phylo to put agentic AI into drug discovery — KexinHuang5 · 2026-07-29
- AM Forum launches on GitHub as an open space for human-centered AI research — EchoShao8899 · 2026-07-29
- Stanford HAI warns world models need a new governance agenda before safety-critical deployment — StanfordHAI · 2026-07-29
- The Principal-Agent Problem in Research: Researchers Only Care About Their Own Piece of the Puzzle — RexDouglass · 2026-07-28
- How do you evaluate report and deck agents when accuracy misses the real problem — Weekly_Quarter_7875 · 2026-07-28
- Weaviate shows how to retrieve audio directly with Gemini Embedding 2 — eshorten300 · 2026-07-28