AI company says it keeps making safety choices that hurt business
_sholtodouglas · x · 2026-07-28
The poster says the company has repeatedly made choices that hurt its business interests but align with its safety values, citing a no-ZDR setup with Fable for safety monitoring that added cost without product advantage.
He argues this may be the AI company that has most often acted against its own commercial interests in the name of values, and invites others to name similar examples.
More from Companies & People
- A project with 217 interchangeable agents is now a live demo of real workflows — hugobowne · 2026-07-28
- A new essay argues AI will become a system of specialized models, not one giant agent — sull · 2026-07-28
- Numerai lets researchers back their ML predictions with Ethereum — matlabulous · 2026-07-28
- Multiplayer AI still lacks a real permission architecture — edgarpavlovsky · 2026-07-28
- Custom SWE-bench on a Rails codebase finds Opus 5 tied Fable 5 on quality — sergeykarayev · 2026-07-28
- Apple and Google could win consumer AI by bundling free assistants and personal context — SumitGup · 2026-07-28