A proposal calls for LLM prompts to replace peer review’s first pass
ChenhaoTan · x · 2026-07-27
The post endorses a proposal to replace conventional peer review with a private, well-engineered LLM prompt followed by author rebuttal and an AC decision. The idea is to turn a poor-reviewing problem from an incentive issue into an engineering one, while saving time and potentially improving review quality.
It also suggests building one ecosystem for AI agents and another for humans, with useful information flowing between the two. The author invites others to collaborate on making that happen.
More from AGI Musings
- Gary Marcus says ARC-AGI’s name makes people think it tests AGI itself — GaryMarcus · 2026-07-27
- Fchollet says personality is partly innate, but can be reshaped from 15 to 25 — fchollet · 2026-07-27
- Creator says AGI is basically here and we are already in the singularity — yacineMTB · 2026-07-27
- Fake AGI Club launch pitches “GoalOS Singularity Navigator Ω” as a singularity dashboard — Ghost_Pilot_MD · 2026-07-27
- OpenAI researchers urged to probe whether models can become long-term misaligned — deanwball · 2026-07-27
- Ryan Greenblatt says today’s AI still cannot automate AI R&D or a typical SWE job — RyanGreenblatt · 2026-07-27