CoRL 2026 AC says two papers were desk-rejected over fake citations and formatting
YuXiang_IRVL · x · 2026-07-27
Finished my #CoRL2026 AC duties. Some takeaways:
- Two papers were desk rejected for non-existent references under the generative-AI citation policy and for formatting requirement violations.
- The attached chart shows the distribution of 24 reviewer scores across the 8 papers that went through full review.
The post highlights how conference review pipelines are enforcing citation integrity and formatting compliance, while also giving a snapshot of score spread across reviewed submissions.
More from Research
- Sean Cai shares a State of Data talk on data quality research — AI Engineer · 2026-07-27
- Paper of the week revisits scenario theory for non-convex optimization — tomssilver · 2026-07-27
- A model claims 96% next-token accuracy with no DNN and no training — granvilleDSC · 2026-07-27
- ProgramBench adds Pareto curves as models improve sharply just two months after launch — jyangballin · 2026-07-27
- RL study finds LLM agents generalize better with richer state information than realistic tasks — Graham_dePenros · 2026-07-27
- BeeLlama.cpp v0.4.1 adds KV-cache precision tails and new quantization modes — Anbeeld · 2026-07-27