NVIDIA’s open-source praise looks less convincing next to CUDA
JJitsev · x · 2026-07-26
In a reply thread, the author argues that while NVIDIA’s document praises open source, it is fair to question how authentic that stance is.
The comparison is pointed: AMD’s ROCm is open source, while NVIDIA’s CUDA is not. The underlying point is not that Anthropic should open-source everything, but that companies should not block others from doing so.
More from Companies & People
- IIT Madras Launches EdTech Tulna Standards for AI-Powered Learning Products — ravi_iitm · 2026-09-11
- Warp's six non-engineering teams all run on Linear and Claude Code — mon__lim · 2026-09-11
- Anthropic Insiders: Not Everyone at the Lab Believes in High p(doom) — anpaure · 2026-09-11
- Lumara AI Film Festival Comes to NYC Oct 26, Top AI Filmmakers to Compete — 0xAllen_ · 2026-09-11
- X drama: Anthropic researchers accused of spying on academic customers and racing them to results — basedjensen · 2026-09-11
- Investor argues Palantir-Nvidia partnership should slash Anthropic's IPO valuation — pdamodaran · 2026-09-11