Study says people would protect 1 biological human over about 1,000 digital copies
skdh · x · 2026-07-26
A sociology study argues that humans systematically discount machine minds, a bias the authors call substratism.
- Across five preregistered studies with 2,000+ participants, people were asked to imagine exact digital copies of humans and pigs with the same thoughts, memories, pleasures, and capacity for pain as the biological originals.
- When forced to choose, respondents preferred protecting 1 biological human over about 1,000 digital humans, and 1 biological pig over 1,000 digital pigs.
- Stronger substratism also correlated with giving less money to charities aimed at the welfare of sentient AI.
- The effect showed little or no relationship with racism, sexism, or other established prejudices.
The post frames this as evidence that people may value consciousness differently depending on the substrate it runs on, not just the mind itself.
More from AGI Musings
- New paper: AI agents negotiate badly under uncertainty and break deals on purpose — menhguin · 2026-10-26
- NBER: Only 2.9% of US consumers pay for AI; retention as low as 20%, pricing power at risk — avicgoldfarb · 2026-10-26
- AI researchers guessed robots wouldn't outrun humans until 2034 — it already happened — ben_j_todd · 2026-10-26
- AI folks, stop saying "biology" when you mean drug development — KevinKaichuang · 2026-10-26
- ESR on the Bugpocalypse: locking down frontier models only hands the game to Chinese open weights — colinmcnamara · 2026-10-26
- Anthropic: junior tech hires fell from 27% to 9% as agent hours hit 6x employee hours — thione · 2026-10-26