NeurIPS review timing sparks debate over whether meta-reviews should come first
IanArawjo · x · 2026-07-24
The thread argues that meta-reviews are typically written before rebuttals at HCI venues, because their purpose is to guide what authors should prioritize in the rebuttal. The poster says NeurIPS’s process feels backwards to them, since early meta-reviews can anchor both reviewers and authors before the rebuttal is even complete.
Related event: NeurIPS Review Sequence Sparks Meta-Review Debate(4 posts)→
More from Research
- Fortnow: P vs NP beyond AI's reach, but NP vs L separations could fall — fortnow · 2026-09-11
- MaP-WAM tackles non-Markovian robot manipulation with memory-grounded planning — Sizhe Zhao · 2026-09-11
- Negative Self-Distillation improves LLM reasoning by avoiding flawed reasoning paths — Rongcan Pei · 2026-09-11
- DeepMind-led paper makes design docs the source of truth, code disposable — SMART regenerates in 1.5-3h for ~$100 — Roger_M_Taylor · 2026-09-11
- GameWorld wins Best Paper Runner-Up at ECCV 2026 Multimodal Digital Agents Workshop — MikeShou1 · 2026-09-11
- Yann LeCun live at ECCV on World Models — Weak_Assistance_5261 · 2026-09-11