NeurIPS review timing sparks debate over whether meta-reviews should come first
IanArawjo · x · 2026-07-24
The thread argues that meta-reviews are typically written before rebuttals at HCI venues, because their purpose is to guide what authors should prioritize in the rebuttal. The poster says NeurIPS’s process feels backwards to them, since early meta-reviews can anchor both reviewers and authors before the rebuttal is even complete.
Related event: NeurIPS Review Sequence Sparks Meta-Review Debate(4 posts)→
More from Research
- rauchg reproduces OpenAI's covert CPU-channel finding: chat across Firecracker microVMs with no network — ccerrato147 · 2026-10-27
- Microsoft Research: ForkPilot cuts long-horizon agent compute by up to 59% — EliasEskin · 2026-10-27
- Microsoft's TeleTune evolves agent skills from offline user telemetry — EliasEskin · 2026-10-27
- FlexGlue: sparse-to-dense matching that beats dense accuracy at a fraction of the cost — zhenjun_zhao · 2026-10-27
- Mundo turns a few room photos into an explorable, simulatable 3D world — at 1.5 FPS — mark_k · 2026-10-27
- Mathematics as an experimental science: Marc Lelarge to talk LLM-driven math experiments at ENS — marc_lelarge · 2026-10-27