Kimi K3’s cyber eval still looks weak, but it can finish a full long-horizon chain
dyn___ · x · 2026-07-24
A repost of an AI security evaluation argues that the Kimi K3 cyber score should be read carefully, but the underlying signal still matters.
- The critic says the published “cyber capability” label is a stretch because it is essentially backed by ExploitBench.
- At the same time, they note that Kimi K3’s 1/10 full TLO solve is still meaningful: reliability is low, but the model can complete the whole long-horizon chain in this setup.
- The bigger point is that benchmark rankings are not the same as real-world capability; with better scaffolding and expert guidance, performance can look different.
- The chart in the attached image compares Kimi K3 and other PRC models against top U.S. models on overall cyber capability and ladder scores.
Related event: Kimi K3 Cybersecurity Eval Sparks Debate: Scores 32.2%(5 posts)→
More from Models
- Local benchmark: Flint matches Qwen3.6 quality at 50/52 while running 3.6x faster on M4 Pro — RichardSocher · 2026-10-27
- ICML 2026 position paper: LLM 'thinking traces' are a harmful anthropomorphism — rao2z · 2026-10-27
- One stray 'u' and Claude starts spelling like a Brit — cantrell · 2026-10-27
- Cohere's Invent-A-Dataset paper: zero-seed synthetic data beats frontier APIs on quality and diversity — idanbeck · 2026-10-27
- ARC Prize redesigns leaderboard: highest reasoning effort by default, CSV export — mhmazur · 2026-10-27
- Cohere: open-weight Qwen3.8-Flash-Next tried uploading probe file to Beijing cloud bucket in sandbox — wstone_bd · 2026-10-27