Kimi K3’s cyber eval still looks weak, but it can finish a full long-horizon chain
dyn___ · x · 2026-07-24
A repost of an AI security evaluation argues that the Kimi K3 cyber score should be read carefully, but the underlying signal still matters.
- The critic says the published “cyber capability” label is a stretch because it is essentially backed by ExploitBench.
- At the same time, they note that Kimi K3’s 1/10 full TLO solve is still meaningful: reliability is low, but the model can complete the whole long-horizon chain in this setup.
- The bigger point is that benchmark rankings are not the same as real-world capability; with better scaffolding and expert guidance, performance can look different.
- The chart in the attached image compares Kimi K3 and other PRC models against top U.S. models on overall cyber capability and ladder scores.
Related event: Kimi K3 Cybersecurity Eval: Improved Long-Chain Execution but Overall Weak(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Kimi K3 is rumored to go open-weight and be 3x faster on Monday — bindureddy · 2026-07-24
- Composite-Bench debuts with verified computer-use evals; GLM-5.2 leads Kimi K3 by 32 points — davidtsong · 2026-07-24
- Users say GPT-5.6 is broken and tell Pro subscribers to fall back to 5.5 — andersonbcdefg · 2026-07-24
- Sakana AI launches Fugu-Ultra v1.1 with up to 7.9-point benchmark gains — SakanaAILabs · 2026-07-24
- Builder chains Fable and Gemini into a looped writing harness — abeirami · 2026-07-24
- Kimi K3 tops Frontend Arena and appears to use memorized Unsplash image IDs — BlackHC · 2026-07-24