NeurIPS meta-review-before-rebuttal process gets challenged as anchoring decisions too early
xwang_lk · x · 2026-07-24
The post questions why NeurIPS requires initial meta reviews before rebuttals. The author argues the sequence can anchor both ACs and reviewers too early, while authors may be judged before rebuttals are considered. If the final decision is made after rebuttal and discussion, the post asks why a preliminary meta review is needed at all.
Related event: NeurIPS Review Sequence Sparks Meta-Review Debate(4 posts)→
More from Research
- New paper: Absolute pose estimation from affine cues and gravity direction — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- LoMa Paper Ships REALLY HardPairs Dataset, Accepted at ECCV 2026 — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Johns Hopkins Launches Full-Stack Hands-on Robot Learning Class with SO-101 Arm Kits — _krishna_murthy · 2026-09-11
- SyncWorld: In-Context Robot World Model Simulates Unseen Views and Embodiments Zero-Shot — ChongZzZhang · 2026-09-11
- A 3D Pose Dataset for Dogs Released — ducha_aiki · 2026-09-11
- Five tells that still make AI video read as AI, from physics glitches to missing operators — NewPhoneWhotiz · 2026-09-11