AI “loops” may be turning into a broader long-task capability, not a narrow pattern
mattbeane · x · 2026-07-24
A tweet thread argues that “loops” may be a short-lived label for a broader capability: models that can keep working on long tasks until they reach a defined goal.
- Simon Willison says models like Fable and GPT-5.6 can do this out of the box, unassisted.
- Thariq replies that people use “loop” to mean different things: the narrow ralph loop may fade, but schedule- or trigger-based loops are still important.
- He points to Claude Tag as an example, describing it as mostly memory plus org context from Slack rather than a simple prompt that repeatedly calls tools.
- The exchange ends with Willison joking that he may not understand all the current meanings of a “loop.”
Related event: Simon Willison: Native Long-Task Skills Will Outphase AI Loops(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Lab monkeys at $30-80K each: a 4-year breeding cycle is the real preclinical drug bottleneck — zebird0 · 2026-10-27
- CJR: journalists should stop hyping AI's supposed humanity — just say 'rogue' — ShakeelHashim · 2026-10-27
- PhD applicant emails up 4x YoY due to AI — writing without AI now makes you stand out — AI4Code · 2026-10-27
- Weil's collapse shows BigLaw dies from eroding belief, not a broken business model — jkubicki · 2026-10-27
- All 8 Transformer paper authors left Google, and rival labs captured most of the frontier value — signulll · 2026-10-27
- Anthropic's S-1 pledges AI for curing diseases and serving 4.6B underserved patients — petergyang · 2026-10-27