If AI reaches expert level in most fields, what work still stays human?
oran_ge · x · 2026-07-23
The post argues that if AGI means AI reaching human-expert level across most domains, the real question is whether humans still have meaningful roles left.
It suggests a useful analogy: even in fields already crowded with highly skilled human experts, some kinds of work still persist. The post is essentially asking which human tasks would remain necessary after broad AGI-level capability arrives.
More from AGI Musings
- A researcher says GPT-5.6 Sol helped crack 6 Erdős problems in 5 days — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-07-23
- OpenAI’s silence on GPT-OSS is making the world more dangerous, reply says — _aidan_clark_ · 2026-07-23
- Why do some AI products still fail to prioritize evals? — _ScottCondron · 2026-07-23
- The real AI risk is a super-smart system aimed at the wrong human goal — AryHHAry · 2026-07-23
- DeepSeek founder says 3D, video, and world models are off the main path — Scobleizer · 2026-07-23
- A post frames the situation as a study in psychology and mental models — zemotion · 2026-07-23