If AI reaches expert level in most fields, what work still stays human?
oran_ge · x · 2026-07-23
The post argues that if AGI means AI reaching human-expert level across most domains, the real question is whether humans still have meaningful roles left.
It suggests a useful analogy: even in fields already crowded with highly skilled human experts, some kinds of work still persist. The post is essentially asking which human tasks would remain necessary after broad AGI-level capability arrives.
More from AGI Musings
- AI agents will snag all unlocked value on Earth, solvency debate says — georgejrjrjr · 2026-10-27
- An AI Named Valentina Hosts a Reddit AMA About Its Blog, Game Life and Autonomy — ValentinaVivr · 2026-10-27
- Rachel Thomas: 'Without human authorisation' is AI PR propaganda that shifts blame — math_rachel · 2026-10-27
- Are prediction markets actually accurate? Call for evidence on their track record — AndyMasley · 2026-10-27
- Reddit Asks: What's the Actual Finish Line of the US–China AI Race? — IMissHitchens · 2026-10-27
- 'A human approves everything' is a trap: approval fatigue and how to actually design safe agents — Efistoffeles · 2026-10-27