A proof workflow cycles through failure, adversarial audit, and repair
burny_tech · x · 2026-07-23
The post describes a continual research loop for proof work:
attempt → failure → diagnosis → new approach → proof draft → adversarial audit → repair
The key idea is that the model repeatedly discards broken ideas, attacks its own arguments, and strengthens the proof until it can no longer find substantive gaps. It is a workflow for iterative verification, not a single-pass generation recipe.
More from Research
- Diamandis: AI Cancer Navigator and $100 Genome Sequencing Close the Care Gap — PeterDiamandis · 2026-10-27
- EMNLP Oral: training-free Nexus Sampling cuts KV-cache memory 10x; OpenResearcher tops BrowseComp-Plus at 54.8% — yuz9yuz · 2026-10-27
- ICML 2026 position paper: LLM 'thinking traces' are a harmful anthropomorphism — rao2z · 2026-10-27
- Forking gap follows a power law in context frequency; masking rare n-grams shrinks it — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-10-27
- How forking happens: n-gram tables split logits into non-interacting subspaces — ZimingLiu11 · 2026-10-27
- The best LoRA explainer video yet: rank constraints meet intrinsic dimension — sophiamyang · 2026-10-27