Researchers Debate: Why RL Training on Agent Harnesses Generalizes Better
srush_nlp · x · 2026-07-23
A discussion sparked by Sholto Douglas and Rachel Lim's research. Sasha Rush questioned the experiment for merely comparing a raw LLM to one with a Python interpreter, failing to see how it proves the need for token-by-token input. Sholto clarified that the experiment compares direct base LM training against training an LM equipped with a harness, with evaluations deliberately introducing out-of-distribution task lengths or topics. Data shows that RL training on the harness yields better generalization, an effect not seen when arbitrarily applying standard harnesses. He emphasized that the token-by-token input is crucial because the harness shapes the context trajectories for the underlying LM's individual calls.
Related event: LLM Generalization Debate: Intrinsic Ability or Harness Illusion(10 posts)→
More from Research
- NEJM AI: Generative AI Intervention Effectively Mitigates College Student Depression — zakkohane · 2026-07-23
- Cohere to Host Talk on LLM Agent Reliability & Uncertainty Signals — Cohere_Labs · 2026-07-23
- Writer Study: Optimizing AI Harness Reduces Costs by 41% Without Losing Accuracy — bendee983 · 2026-07-23
- Reasoning traces from math breakthroughs may reveal how models think — benno_krojer · 2026-07-23
- A gold-medal AI result will open-source its full models, data, and pipeline — kuchaev · 2026-07-23
- A Killer App for Humanoid Robots: Teleoperation and Telepresence — adam_dorr · 2026-07-23