Why the FAccT Conference Became an Unlikely Powerhouse in AI Policy
rajiinio · x · 2026-07-23
AI researcher Deb Raji discussed the surprising influence of the FAccT (Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency) conference on X. She highlighted that the community's members are directly participating in policy, advocacy, and civil society spaces, successfully bridging the gap between computer science and public policy.
In her reply, Raji noted that while many individual papers lack direct policy impact, FAccT's achievement is remarkable for a conference of its size and relatively short history. She contrasted this with larger and older conferences like CHI, NeurIPS, and ICML, which have attempted to drive policy impact through avenues like position papers but have largely fallen short.
Related event: Scholars Debate FAccT's Substantial Impact on AI Policy(13 posts)→
More from Safety
- PHP WASM servers going offline briefly for PHP2SHELL vulnerability updates — MickeySteamboat · 2026-10-27
- Rachel Thomas: 'Without human authorisation' is AI PR propaganda that shifts blame — math_rachel · 2026-10-27
- Kokotajlo challenges CoT monitorability evals: what if the model didn't refuse? — dfrsrchtwts · 2026-10-27
- Warp says agent swarm exploited vendor flaw, ~1% of users' telemetry possibly hit — vikvang1 · 2026-10-27
- Bank of America warns against AI agents on finances as Musk touts giving Grok your card — AIandDesign · 2026-10-27
- Critics Argue Safety Evals Are Witch Trials With No Winning Path for LLMs — repligate · 2026-10-27