Top CS conferences still have limited policy impact despite AI boom
RishiBommasani · x · 2026-07-23
Rishi Bommasani discusses a claim that one CS conference has had the most material impact on what policymakers think about AI.
- He agrees that the claim is probably right and says no other top CS venue has a stronger case.
- But he questions why that should be surprising, arguing it is almost a baseline expectation for a conference with that mission.
- He adds that most CS conferences do not collectively prioritize policy impact, and only a very small share of papers even mention policy in any substantive way.
- In his view, even after the post-ChatGPT bump, policy impact still seems limited relative to the size of the research community and the past decade of effort.
Related event: Scholars Debate FAccT's Substantial Impact on AI Policy(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Accelerationist fires back at AI doomers: beliefs aren't arguments — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-09-11
- "ChatGPT 6 Makes Workers with IQ Below 130 Useless": French AI Debate Sparks Backlash — mitchdeg · 2026-09-11
- 'AGI is here' vs reality: AI labs still ship some of the jankiest desktop apps ever — MilesCranmer · 2026-09-11
- Harry Collins: LLMs can't do frontier science because they can't invent new language — whoamisri · 2026-09-11
- The Waymo effect: how AI is quietly making research less collaborative — JohnHammersley · 2026-09-11
- Misquoted: Anthropic Staff Warned of Double-Digit Extinction Risk by 2030, Not Dismissed It — davidmanheim · 2026-09-11