Top CS conferences still have limited policy impact despite AI boom
RishiBommasani · x · 2026-07-23
Rishi Bommasani discusses a claim that one CS conference has had the most material impact on what policymakers think about AI.
- He agrees that the claim is probably right and says no other top CS venue has a stronger case.
- But he questions why that should be surprising, arguing it is almost a baseline expectation for a conference with that mission.
- He adds that most CS conferences do not collectively prioritize policy impact, and only a very small share of papers even mention policy in any substantive way.
- In his view, even after the post-ChatGPT bump, policy impact still seems limited relative to the size of the research community and the past decade of effort.
Related event: Scholars Debate FAccT's Substantial Impact on AI Policy(13 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- tszzl: Smart young people should choose tech over medicine or teaching — tszzl · 2026-10-27
- Greg Brockman announces AI-assisted discoveries in math, CS, and quantum field theory — gdb · 2026-10-27
- AI is simultaneously flooding journals with slop and cleaning up human slop — _akpiper · 2026-10-27
- EMNLP researcher worries LLM-polished talks are erasing individual nuance — lucy3_li · 2026-10-27
- Paul Graham: Not Reading or Writing Will Become as Ubiquitous as Smoking Once Was — IanArawjo · 2026-10-27
- 2012 whole-cell model paper shows we can scalably measure only ~5 of the processes needed to simulate biology — niloofar_mire · 2026-10-27